Another One

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 14340

Reach is developed by Bungie. And the other guy beat me to the rest.

I don't see the big deal when the "great looking" CoD4 ran at 600p. I didn't hear anyone b1tching about that. The only reason people b1tch is because it's Halo and people enjoy bashing it.

6035d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

I just figure those that really like Halo have already read the books. If they haven't they probably never will.

6037d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I can almost guarantee it wont follow the story of the books. There are a couple stories that don't get told in the book and you can bet that this game will cover those aspects. (i.e. the defense of the reactor complex) We know the reactor complex falls but we never really witness that part of the story. And who knows what happens to that particular group of Spartans after the reactors fall. Hell, we don't even know who those Spartans were or anything about them. There's a lot of story that c...

6037d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You gotta admit, it's slightly more intelligent than his first post. First post was completely unintelligent and baseless and he at least graduated to 1st grade name calling. Congratulations.

6041d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

how people get upset if something they deem wrong is said about their console of choice. You people realize that a lot of them own the competitions console and probably even play them on occasion. They play up their company, of course, but that doesn't mean they hate the competition. It's only you fanboys that get all upset. You guys need to grow up and get a grip.

I promise each company isn't coming to the gaming websites looking for ass kissers to pay for their loyalty. lol. No...

6041d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

They're building a new engine for Reach. Every game in the Halo series has had a new engine with the exception of ODST, which uses the Halo 3 engine. (they squeezed even more out of that engine with ODST. It looks better than H3)

EDIT: And I hope your not just screwing with us OP. That wouldn't be cool. I always have my doubts about things like this, but it seems legit. I hope it is.

6041d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

If Bungie had confirmed that, it would be all over Bnet. They have not confirmed for 09. They wouldn't confirm for that reason anyway. The people that want the beta will keep it until it comes out or buy a used copy when the time comes.

6041d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

He makes some crazy accurate replicas. The detail in the wood and the working mechanisms are amazing. Good stuff.

6041d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

That was very well said. I agree completely with what you say. Most gay people I've been around couldn't care less if the word "gay" was used as long as it wasn't in a negative fashion towards someone with that sexual orientation.

6041d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

How does someone with so little intelligence have so many bubbles? People want to hear see what this moron says? Must be more PS3 fanboys than I thought. Staying somewhat neutral hasn't gotten me any more bubbles so maybe I should start talking the PS3 up and making horribly false statements about other consoles.

6041d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why do people always use the minority to stereotype a huge group of people? I play on LIVE quite a bit I guess, and I do not hear anything racist or homophobic nine times out of ten. The small, vocal minority are the ones you speak of and they don't represent most of the people on LIVE. Just like the minority on PSN that do it wouldn't represent the larger group.

6041d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

We have no confirmation that the beta is hitting the exact day ODST comes out. In fact, there's more than a strong possibility that we wont see a beta until spring 2010, though I can see it maybe in the winter of 2009/2010. Just don't expect it day one.

6041d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not really surprising considering the name of the site. There's another article saying Prototype sold more. Both can't be right and this is the only one spinning it to say "InFamous was more popular among those who had a choice of both". Way to go fanboys. Spinning an article hurts your credibility. Just lay it out all the way without the spin and let the fanboys spin it. Don't let fanboy goggles ruin credibility. I doubt that's what a site with that name is worried about though.

6043d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Microsoft doesn't tell me anything. I'm not a 12 year old fanboy. It's a new engine and your going to have to deal with being wrong. Every Halo game has had a new engine with the exception of ODST which uses the Halo 3 engine. Do some research and you MIGHT get your facts straight.

And this article is bull. The job posting isn't for Reach. That's never been in dispute as far as I go. It's more nonsense posted by a site that reads too much into something. Just like what Skoar does...

6043d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

B.O.B aka Bobby Ray is the man. Just thought I'd point that out.

6043d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

talk out of your ass don't you. It's ok little guy. I know it's hard to accept that the PS3, with all it's great games, doesn't have one that competes with Halo.

6043d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

Wow, the uniformed bullsh!t floating in this website is hilarious. It's a new engine and the game has been in development since 07. Fanboys love to spout trash before they know the truth. Grow up little boys.

6043d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

The posting is not for Reach. Reach is built and in some form playable. The guys at Bungie had a big playtest type thing on Bungie day where they got together and played Reach. It's for some other game, and it may be Halo related, but it's not Reach.

Completely ridiculous. Why would they be hiring for that if the game is made and playable? It's not for Reach so stop with every job posting being for Reach.

Disagree all you want. The game's playable, the engine is mad...

6043d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

is what that post was. I'm so glad you said that because it's possibly the most logical thing said in this entire thread. If it can be moved to the beginning of this thread, then it should. You should even send this to the guy who wrote the article. It's a shame I can only give 1 bubble and 1 agree. You deserve much more than that.

6043d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

point out the intelligent responses that make him look stupid? He's calling out the ignorant people and just looking past the intelligent ones. In doing this he reaffirms the fact that he's incapable of looking at thing in any way but negatively. Makes his argument even more unintelligent.

6043d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment